Changes in the Constitution of Japan are Essential

Recently, Prime Minister of Japan Shinzo Abe, also the leader of the Liberal Democratic Party, stated changes in the constitution as the ultimate goal of its party. This statement could imply Japanese remilitarization and greater involvement in the field of humanitarian intervention that is not so relevant to the interests of Japan. But after all, this issue comes to the bottom line that the security of Japana would not be granted with its long-term dependency on the US military.

The dynamics of the world security have been dramatically changing day-to-day. Not only North Korea poses constant threats on East Asia but also Chinese greater sphere of influence over Pacific and South China Sea concerns its neighbouring nations. Given this change in balance of power in East Asia, our constitution that persists to the extreme pacifism after the WWII does not keep up with its current world order. Our legal framework needs to adapt to the constantly changing balance of power. Last year, President Obama stated that the US would no longer act as "world`s police" and acknowledged the limited influence of the United States. This meant to emphasize that Japan as an independent state needs to protect its national security on its own.

You may argue that changes in the constitution will increase Japan`s susceptibility to both regional and international conflicts. But we also have to admit that our current constitution has not secured our territories in the past decades, given the conflicting sovereignty issues over Takeshima, Senkaku and Karafuto islands with its neighbouring states. I would further argue that changes in the constitution will rather apply the idea of deterrence, which will not erupt an unnecessary conflict with its neighbouring states.

Complexity in History: Who Should be Blamed?

              In a class, an English teacher asked me ,"Who should be responsible for throwing nuclear bombs in Japan? Should the scientists who invented it be accused?" I said, "Well, I think the government which took an advantage of the scientific invention should be accused. Any invention such as dynamite and airplanes can be beneficial and harmful, largely depending on how people use it. " I think my answer was convincing enough, but the teacher reasoned that nuclear bombs, which are definitely weapons, would not have been made without those scientists and thus the scientists should be accused!

               To me, this question was very hard to answer with confidence. The responsibility for this incident in Nagasaki and Hiroshima can be attributed to many individuals and groups, and I think this is the complexity when we try to have a consensus on recognition of historical events. For example, Some people could argue that WW2 would not have happened if WW1 did not happen even though both of them did not seem directly related each other. But then, if Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria did not go to Sarajevo, WW1 would not have happened. But then, if....

              I think we can endlessly keep attributing the cause of the WW2 to the past events. History, most of the time, happens with cause-effect relationships. Thus, if I try to answer the question teacher asked in a class, I could say, "Perhaps, the god should be responsible for the nuclear bombs because it created us."

An Innovative Solution to Great Pacific Garbage Patch

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ljrbtYlku-k

            I have watched this Tedtalk about how the Great Pacific Garbage Patch can be solved. The speaker is a18 year-old highschool student, and I find his idea very innovative.

            . We have always thought of education and increasing the awareness as a first-step of the solution for such global environmental issues. But we have never thought of how we can directly solve such issue. His idea is rather direct and simple because his idea is a machine that is simply trapping trashes.
           

            His idea is still very radical because he used ocean current as a mover of the machine to save the maintanace costs of the machine. As a result of this low-budget solution, he expected some entrepreneurs could invest to profit from selling plastics. This profitable solution certainly increases demand for investment.

            His idea is not concrete yet and we might have to be skeptical about his statistics and expectations. But his idea is innovative and I believe some developments will be made on his idea.

Great Pacific Garbage Patch

            Have you ever heard of Great Pacific Garbage Patch? For those who have never heard, it is an environmental issue in which trash mainly from Japan and the United States are accumulated in the center of the Pacific Ocean as a result of North Atlantic Gyre.

            I just found this serious and global environmental issue from my geography class and was totally shocked that Japan was the large contributor of throwing away garbage in the ocean. In Japan, I used to hear that Asian Dust and air pollutions from China were very problemic for Japan, and I see many people complained about China`s loose environmental policy. Nevertheless, I have never heard of my Japanese friends and media talking about the Great Pacific Garbage Patch. Although Japan should be largely responsible for this issue, many Japanese people including myself are not aware of this global issue. (which is also problemic!)

            I think when I consider any global issue, I cannot judge the responsibility for it based only on my personal experience which is often influenced by Japanese media because my country might be doing something unacceptable in other parts of the world. From this finding, I realized that "perspectives" are very important whenever we evaluate the responsibility of any country for the global issues because a seemingly environmentally friendly country like Japan - at least I think Japan is - can be a monster in "unknown" environmental issues.

My Holidays in Saigon Changed My Perspectives on Vietnamese Community

I visited my fatherland (Saigon/Ho Chi Minh City) during this lunar year. I had some interesting findings there.

1-I am trying to call HCMC as Saigon because HCMC might defame the people in Saigon. (Just for those who do not know the difference between Saigon and HCMC, Saigon was a name of HCMC before the Vietnam became one country in 1970s.) But people there actually call Saigon as HCMC, and my dad told me that people now would not care much about whether we call Saigon as HCMC or Saigon. This fact told me that there is now better integration of North and South Vietnam because people try to follow the name called by the current Vietnamese government.

2-The flag of Vietnam, as you may know, contains a big yellow star and red background, both of which obviously represent socialism. I thought Saigon (I still call Saigon to show some respect even if people there may not care.) did not want to put up the Vietnamese flags, but I saw many houses there putting up the Vietnamese flags. That scenery of houses with many Vietnamese flags told me that people now feel they are a part of Vietnam and not South Vietnam.

I have visited Saigon for many times, but this time was a bit more interesting as I tried to see Saigon with lenses that I had never tried to put on. :)

Chaebol and Economic Disparity

Chaebol is a term to describe  South Korean large conglomerate. As some of you may know, the economy of South Korea largely depends on Chaebol as the top 10 large multinational corporations take up 75% of GDP in South Korea.

But I just learnt that the 90% of employees are taken up by small and medium-sized businesses, and yet the rest of the 10% (Chaebol) dominate the GDP share in South Korea. This certainly tells us about economic disparity. Workers at small and medium-sized businesses do not economically benefit as much as those at large corporations do.

From the South Korean national government`s perspective, however, it cannot easily give a solution for the economic marginalization. These South Korean multinationals lead the economy of South Korea and yet their existence cannot support the employment in South Korea. Thus, the government needs to consider benefit and loss for each conflicting groups and take a policy which allows both to benefit to some extent (win-win solution!).

Still, to me, ensuring the equity within the country would be relatively more important than allowing small portion of people to dominate the country.

The Way a Product is Advertised Tells a Typical Lifestyle in Your Country.

(It's been a while since I posted on this blog last time. I had a busy mock examination for two weeks, but I will keep writing this blog as long as I can!)

I walked down the street in Hanoi, Vietnam to get to my favorite coffee shop. And I suddenly came across with bunch of motorbikes with advertisements on their back seats. Since then, I was thinking that the most effective advertisement would be different because it is largely based on a typical lifestyle in your country.

In Japan, the most popular and convenient transport is a train; thus, I see a large number of advertisements wherever you walk within the stations. In the United States when I visited 2 years ago, I did not see as many advertisements as I did in Japan. Instead, I still receive so many ads from American businesses via e-mail, probably because the internet access rate in the United States is significantly high. In Vietnam, needless to say, motorbikes are vital transports for majority of Vietnamese people, so there is no wonder why I saw the motorbikes with advertisements on the street.

Now, how are products advertised in your country?